mirror of
https://github.com/YGGverse/aquatic.git
synced 2026-04-02 18:55:32 +00:00
README: update aquatic_ws benchmark section
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ac6bd9a22
commit
482870b174
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ of the `aquatic_http` section above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Performance was compared to
|
Performance was compared to
|
||||||
[wt-tracker](https://github.com/Novage/wt-tracker) and [bittorrent-tracker](https://github.com/webtorrent/bittorrent-tracker), using
|
[wt-tracker](https://github.com/Novage/wt-tracker) and [bittorrent-tracker](https://github.com/webtorrent/bittorrent-tracker), using
|
||||||
`aquatic_ws_load_test` with one worker, 16 connections and 2 offers per request. Both comparison trackers reached 100% single core utilization.
|
`aquatic_ws_load_test` with one worker, 16 connections and 2 offers per request. Both comparison trackers reached 100% single-core utilization.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Server responses per second, best result in bold:
|
Server responses per second, best result in bold:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ Server responses per second, best result in bold:
|
||||||
| ----------- | ------------ | ------------------ |
|
| ----------- | ------------ | ------------------ |
|
||||||
| __126k__ | 54k | 28k |
|
| __126k__ | 54k | 28k |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This benchmark is not very realistic, as it simulates a tiny number of clients each sending a large number of requests, but I still think that it gives a useful indication of relative performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Load testing
|
## Load testing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There are load test binaries for all protocols. They use a CLI structure
|
There are load test binaries for all protocols. They use a CLI structure
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue